simardcasanova’s avatarsimardcasanova’s Twitter Archive—№ 8,605

    1. - Economists whose (important) subfield is threatened by a decision made by Web of Science: "Our field is in danger" - WoS: "Thanks for the feedback, please contact our customer care" 1/ "Customer care", seriously?! 2/ The feedback thing = polite way to say "we don’t care" @clarivate/1012059348619726851
      Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar Mood +9 🙂
  1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
    Besides the (deeply) inappropriate wording, this tweet is a textbook example of a tweet made to appease a potential PR disaster. It’s pure communication, something I’ve learned from my experience when I interacted with many tech companies online.
    simardcasanova’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
    1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
      I have read dozen of tweets like this, it’s almost a standardized answer made to deflect criticism coming from "angry customers". The fact a threat to a subfield in a major science receives this kind of answer/wording is deeply disturbing.
      Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -5 🙁
      1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
        That being said, I don’t say @Clarivate does not care and isn’t ready to listen–I don’t know.
        Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -2 🙁
        1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
          But if it’s the first time you interact with this kind of "customer care" message, @Undercoverhist @ant_mis1 @yannbgiraud you should know that pushing really hard, especially by going public every time you feel the answer is not good enough, is probably the best way to go.
          Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
          1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
            When "customers" pushed that hard, I’ve seen three sets of reactions: - companies that listened and changed their decision - companies that didn’t listened - companies that kind of listened, even if it was often hypocritically
            Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar Mood +1 🙂
            1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
              The firsts strived, the seconds and thirds suffered a significant (and probably irreversible) brand damage. (I won’t name any company publicly as I don’t want to deal with their "customer care team" over there, but I can provide names and examples if needed!)
              Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
              1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
                I hope @Clarivate will fix the #clarivgate as soon as possible. It’s completely unacceptable to see a major economics subfield suffers like this because of one single (and much needed) survey. Economics needs history of economic thought!
                Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood 0