simardcasanova’s avatarsimardcasanova’s Twitter Archive—№ 26,283

    1. I’m reading this paper pretending to replicate another paper and I’m not convinced by its framing My issue is that the two experimental settings are *very* different The replication feels more like another empirical test instead of a true replication Any thought #EconTwitter?
  1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
    Providing another empirical test of an hypothesis is a good thing imo I’m just having a hard time calling such thing a “replication”.