simardcasanova’s avatarsimardcasanova’s Twitter Archive—№ 19,023

      1. …in reply to @undefined
        @MartinSGaynor I agree, but from my experience with ABMs the reason is endogenous: ABMs haven’t been funded well until very recently, and despite some really promising results and ideas, very little came through them because of that
        Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar Mood +1 🙂
    1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
      @MartinSGaynor To me, the underlying question is why econ is so reluctant to fund a promising methodology, whereas physics for instance funded very generously the string theory that didn’t produce anything meaningful
      Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar Mood +4 🙂
  1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
    @MartinSGaynor I think this paper might be really interesting: @mrcpangallo/1201221611669671936?s=21 @mrcpangallo/1201221611669671936
    simardcasanova’s avatar Mood +2 🙂