simardcasanova’s avatarsimardcasanova’s Twitter Archive—№ 18,012

  1. …in reply to @undefined
    @peripheralecon So I guess you’re classify those who believe you as "objective" and the others as dishonest and whatnot, in contradiction of every basic principle of logic This is a textbook example of the no True Scotsman fallacy
    1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
      @peripheralecon That being said, it’s aligned with how you argued since the beginning: no proofs, motivated reasoning, confirmation bias, personal attacks… That’s not how you’re supposed to argue So once again, maybe consider the option you’re mistaken here. Could help you in the future.