simardcasanova’s avatarsimardcasanova’s Twitter Archive—№ 12,621

        1. I’m honestly baffled by the argument in the third screenshot. What’s so wrong to listen to someone else just presenting their work? 🤔 And how is it helpful to question a paper’s motivation after 2 minutes?
          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their APIoh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their APIoh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
          Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar ❤️ 6 Favorites Mood +1 🙂
      1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
        Source: economist.com/finance-and-economics/2019/03/23/a-dispiriting-survey-of-womens-lot-in-university-economics
        Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
      If you really have a point, you will talk about it with the presenter. But in my experience, listening before interrupting eliminates 95% of my comments, because they were dumb or answered two slides later. In other words, listening seems a legit noise filtering device.
      Permalink simardcasanova’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood -5 🙁
  1. …in reply to @simardcasanova
    (And for what I’ve noticed, people who interrupt a lot do make a lot of dumb comments. Once again: how does doing this favor "intellectual rigor"?)
    simardcasanova’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -3 🙁